Since arriving in the country in 2020, Harry has struck up friendships with prominent Democratic Party figures such as former president Barack Obama. 'Harry should welcome the release of his immigration application so the public can see what was put in the application,' he added. 'Any discrepancy between the details provided in his immigration application and the revelations of drug use in Spare would have serious implications for his legal status in the United States. 'There is a very clear US public interest in ensuring Harry did not receive any favorable or preferential treatment by the immigration authorities,' the former senior aide to the late ex-British prime minister said. Nile Gardiner, the director of the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Freedom at the think-tank said the lawsuit looked to achieve 'transparency and accountability.' The pair have had a testy relationship with Britain's tabloid press since stepping back royal duties in the United Kingdom The records for the late musicians George Michael and John Lennon are online, as well as those for the mother of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website has an electronic reading room which contains the files of some celebrities. There is a history of authorities releasing immigration documents about public figures. It was denied 24 hours later, prompting the Washington-based Heritage Foundation to appeal.
government has 20 business days to respond to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act, except for "unusual circumstances.' 'It is safe to stay that the Biden administration has not been fully cooperative in releasing the information requested,' one source said. Sources close to the case suggested officials were obstructing the think-tank's freedom of information request that it made on March 8 of this year. The near-1400 page legal complaint complied by Heritage lawyers argues that there is 'immense public interest' in learning just how Harry answered that question. visa, as happened in the case of the late British singer Amy Winehouse.īut an admission of drug use does not automatically ban you from the country for life.Īny denial of entry can be overturned after an in-person interview at a US consulate or official immigration office, where a waiver can be issued. It reads: 'Are you or have you ever been a drug abuser or addict?'Īnswering yes can result in being denied a U.S. law, anyone who admits to past abuse of illegal narcotics is generally denied entry to the country.Īpplicants for a visa to live and work in America has to tick a box to answer 'yes' or 'no' to a question on past drug use.
The Heritage Foundation, a Right-wing think-tank, published the legal complaint earlier on Monday
0 kommentar(er)
